Most recommended hosting by web developers
Stress tested against the best
To ensure we’re meeting (and exceeding) industry standards, our in-house experts are constantly testing our performance against the best in the business.
“Non-biased, results-based, research-driven comparisons.”
That’s what we set out to deliver. We hope you get some valuable insights from this honest take on how WPMU DEV Hosting compares with the rest.
The results
Here’s what we discovered when we performance-tested each hosting platform.
| Max parallel clients | TTFB average(All locations) | TTFB average(Geo-Optimized) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
WPMU DEV |
572* |
425.10 ms |
16.65 ms |
|
GoDaddy |
45* |
512.65 ms |
24.65 ms |
Compare |
WP Engine |
35* |
585.82 ms |
126.62 ms |
Compare |
Flywheel |
346 |
181.40 ms |
15.52 ms |
Compare |
Cloudways |
511 |
381.96 ms |
13.79 ms |
Compare |
HostGator |
35* |
1.12 s |
729.96 ms |
Compare |
SiteGround |
105 |
789.90 ms |
308.11 ms |
Compare |
Kinsta |
542 |
827.26 ms |
69.56 ms |
Compare |
Bluehost |
105 |
417.59 ms |
118.21 ms |
Compare |
1As of October 2021. Based on starting plans for each platform. For the test, we used two different performance testing tools: loader.io & KeyCDN Tools
*Result before the rate limit exceeded. Learn how we tested.